← Back to Overview

📊 Consistency Model Comparisons

Detailed comparison tables and decision matrices with metric explanations

📖 Understanding the Metrics

Before diving into comparisons, let's understand what each metric means:

💪 Strength

What it measures: How strong the consistency guarantees are.

  • Strongest: No anomalies, perfect consistency
  • Strong: Very few anomalies, high consistency
  • Medium: Some anomalies allowed, balanced
  • Weak: Many anomalies possible, low consistency
  • Weakest: Temporary inconsistencies allowed

⏰ Real-time Order

What it measures: Whether operations must respect the order they actually occurred in real time.

  • ✅ Required: If operation A finishes before B starts, all nodes see A before B
  • ❌ Not Required: Operations can appear in different order than real-time

🌐 Global Order

What it measures: Whether all processes see operations in the same order.

  • ✅ Required: All nodes see operations in identical sequence
  • ❌ Not Required: Different nodes can see different orderings

🔗 Causality

What it measures: Whether cause-and-effect relationships are preserved.

  • ✅ Preserved: If A causes B, all nodes see A before B
  • ⚠️ Partial: Some causal relationships preserved
  • ❌ Not Preserved: Causal relationships can be violated

🔄 Availability

What it measures: System's ability to remain operational during failures.

  • ✅ Totally Available: Works during any network partition
  • ✅ Sticky Available: Available for single-user sessions
  • ⚠️ Limited: Available in some partition scenarios
  • ❌ Not Available: Stops working during partitions

📊 Performance Impact

What it measures: How consistency requirements affect system performance.

  • Latency: Time to complete operations
  • Throughput: Number of operations per second
  • Network Overhead: Communication required between nodes
  • Complexity: Implementation and operational difficulty

Overview Comparison

Model Strength Real-time Order Global Order Causality Availability Primary Use Cases
Strict Serializable Strongest ✅ Required ✅ Required ✅ Preserved ❌ Not Available Banking, Financial Systems
Linearizable Very Strong ✅ Required ✅ Required ✅ Preserved ❌ Not Available Configuration, Coordination
Sequential Strong ❌ Not Required ✅ Required ✅ Preserved ❌ Not Available Distributed Caches
Serializable Strong ❌ Not Required ✅ Required ✅ Preserved ❌ Not Available ACID Databases
Snapshot Isolation Medium-Strong ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ⚠️ Partial ⚠️ Limited MVCC Databases
Repeatable Read Medium-Strong ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ⚠️ Partial ⚠️ Limited SQL Databases
Causal Medium ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ✅ Preserved ⚠️ Limited Social Media, Chat
PRAM Medium-Weak ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ⚠️ Per-Process ✅ Available Distributed Systems
Read Committed Weak ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Preserved ✅ Available Web Applications
Monotonic Reads Weak ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Preserved ✅ Sticky Available Session-based Apps
Read Your Writes Weak ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Preserved ✅ Sticky Available User Profiles
Eventual Weakest ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Required ❌ Not Preserved ✅ Totally Available DNS, CDN

Transaction Isolation Levels

Model Dirty Read Non-repeatable Read Phantom Read Write Skew
Strict Serializable ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented
Serializable ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented
Repeatable Read ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ✅ Possible ✅ Possible
Snapshot Isolation ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ❌ Prevented ✅ Possible
Read Committed ❌ Prevented ✅ Possible ✅ Possible ✅ Possible
Read Uncommitted ✅ Possible ✅ Possible ✅ Possible ✅ Possible

Performance Characteristics

Model Latency Throughput Network Overhead Implementation Complexity
Strict Serializable Very High Very Low Very High Very Complex
Linearizable High Low High Complex
Sequential High Low High Complex
Serializable High Low Medium Complex
Snapshot Isolation Medium Medium Medium Medium
Causal Medium Medium Medium Medium
PRAM Low High Low Simple
Read Committed Low High Low Simple
Session Guarantees Low High Low Simple
Eventual Very Low Very High Very Low Very Simple

Real-World System Examples

🏦 Financial Systems

Strict Serializable

Google Spanner, FaunaDB, FoundationDB - Critical correctness requirements

⚙️ Configuration Systems

Linearizable

etcd, Consul, Zookeeper - Coordination and leader election

🗄️ ACID Databases

Serializable

PostgreSQL, MySQL - Traditional relational databases

💬 Social Media

Causal

MongoDB (with causal reads) - Preserve conversation flow

🌐 Content Delivery

Eventual

DNS, CDNs, Redis, DynamoDB - High availability priority

🛒 E-commerce

Mixed Models

Cart: Eventual, Inventory: Linearizable, Payments: Strict Serializable

Decision Matrix

🎯 Interactive Decision Guide

Answer these questions to find the right consistency model for your use case:

🚨 Is Absolute Correctness Critical?

Examples: Banking, payments, inventory, medical records

Strict Serializable
  • ✅ Zero tolerance for inconsistencies
  • ✅ ACID compliance required
  • ❌ Accept higher latency (100-500ms)
  • ❌ Lower availability during partitions

⚙️ Need Strong Coordination?

Examples: Configuration systems, leader election, distributed locks

Linearizable
  • ✅ Single-object strong consistency
  • ✅ Real-time ordering guaranteed
  • ⚠️ Medium latency (50-200ms)
  • ❌ Not available during network splits

🔄 Need Global Ordering?

Examples: Distributed caches, replicated logs, event sourcing

Sequential Consistency
  • ✅ All nodes see same operation order
  • ✅ Good for state machine replication
  • ⚠️ Medium latency (20-100ms)
  • ❌ Limited availability during partitions

🔗 Are Cause-Effect Relationships Important?

Examples: Social media, chat, collaborative editing, forums

Causal Consistency
  • ✅ Preserves conversation flow
  • ✅ Good performance (10-50ms)
  • ✅ Available during most partitions
  • ⚠️ Complex to implement correctly

👤 Is Per-User Consistency Enough?

Examples: User profiles, shopping carts, personal settings

Session Guarantees
  • ✅ Users see their own changes
  • ✅ Low latency (5-20ms)
  • ✅ High availability (99.9%+)
  • ❌ No global consistency guarantees

🚀 Is Maximum Performance/Availability Priority?

Examples: DNS, CDNs, analytics, caching, content delivery

Eventual Consistency
  • ✅ Maximum availability (99.99%+)
  • ✅ Lowest latency (1-10ms)
  • ✅ Scales globally
  • ❌ Temporary inconsistencies possible

📊 Quick Reference Matrix

High Correctness

Strict Serializable Linearizable

Balanced Trade-offs

Sequential Causal

High Performance

Session Eventual